![]() |
|
Wrong ban : sir [STT]Lucas - Versão para Impressão +- Fórum STT (arquivado) (https://forum.sttserver.net) +-- Fórum: Soluções (https://forum.sttserver.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Fórum: Denúncias (https://forum.sttserver.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Tópico: Wrong ban : sir [STT]Lucas (/showthread.php?tid=2861) |
Wrong ban : sir [STT]Lucas - Trowz - 02/09/2020 Título: Wrong ban from [STT]LucaS
Meu nick: Trowz.nF Acusado: [STT]LucaS Motivo: Wrong ban withouth proofs Provas: ![]() First of all the fact that I have refused to see my files and part of my computer is not true proof that I am using 'Aimbot' I insist, it is unnecessary, the administrator who judged me according to his assumptions is committing a fault, since I DO have proof that I play fair which I showed in my 'Unban Appeal' but he does not have proof to persuade the issue, therefore he gave a verdict that does not make sense not having proof
If you don't have proof and I have it, why did you make a wrong ban?
I hope that you take me, and that the administrator will be judged as he did against me, I have nothing against anyone, it is only a lack of respect for me that the ban has been without presenting me with proofs that I am playing unfairly, and I insist, it was an ASSUMPTION of him.
RE: Wrong ban : sir [STT]Lucas - Akali - 02/09/2020 The procedure of looking at the player's computer is part of the ban review, if a player refuses, then not much to do about it RE: Wrong ban : sir [STT]Lucas - Trowz - 02/09/2020 Regardless of whether I refused or not, it is not a proof or an action that verifies that I am using "hack" (I speak of true action by watching videos or photos where they show that I am not innocent)
RE: Wrong ban : sir [STT]Lucas - Rodrigo2304 - 02/09/2020 good if you really weren't using anything then why did you refuse to watch TV RE: Wrong ban : sir [STT]Lucas - Trowz - 02/09/2020 Then tell me, where's the real ''proofs''? Are there any videos or photos that show that I have something? There aren't, so was it a wrong ban, or do their brains not capture much information? It should be noted that the administrator banned me for a thought of him, that is, at no time did he verify that I have aimbot, therefore the ban was without reason and without evidence, so, stop defending the indefensible boy. (02/09/2020, 15:32)Rodrigo2304 Escreveu: good if you really weren't using anything then why did you refuse to watch TV I tell you again, I find the action they take totally unnecessary because at no time did the administrator literally tell me that I have something, it was a THOUGHT and rather an ASSUMPTION of the administrator, I have several proofs that I have nothing, but you have proof affirming their positions? I will show my files that I USE, I play with SAMPCAC for the same since several people believe that I DO have cleo mods and various things That will be the last thing I will post, I am not going to argue any more what you did makes no sense and you will be frowned upon, I will not ![]() ![]() RE: Wrong ban : sir [STT]Lucas - Lucas - 02/09/2020 It will not be unbanned. Even these photos you sent, you may have edited them friend, do not create more topics or post more on this subject. |